Musina - Mulai is a Zambian girl, just three months old, whose parents are refugees in South Africa. She sleeps facedown on a rag, protected from the unforgiving Limpopo sun by a threadbare, dirty and rickety tent.
She is the youngest of 23 children, most of whom were born in South Africa to refugees from Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Burundi.
The border town of Musina has been their new home for the past week, as the refugee families – many the victims of violent outbreaks xenophobia – ponder a move from South Africa over the border to South Africa`s northern neighbour, Zimbabwe.
Earlier this week some of the children had been hard-hit by diarrhoea and rushed to a clinic in Musina. The stronger ones like Mulai (not her real name), spend their days napping, while the older ones play at a nearby tap, oblivious to their predicament and possible departure from South Africa.
The shelter they have currently is provided at a camp founded by Bishop Simon Sithole, located a few kilometres from the Beitbridge border post.
But while the children frolic and doze, there are no such luxuries for the adults in the seven families of immigrants. The men are restless and constantly holding multi-lingual meetings at the far edge of the wobbly tent. Hushed voices and gestures characterise these meetings, because loud voices would awaken the sleeping tots who are said to have had a decent meal "many days ago".
The seven immigrant families had become an almost permanent feature in Pretoria central where they had camped outside the United Nations High Commission for Refugees for around two years. That was up until Christmas when a series of events saw the group uprooted and make the long trek to Musina in the hope that Zimbabwe may provide a safer, more accommodating haven.
Proud father of eleven, Zambian Alex Masuka has assumed the unenviable task of leading the group of almost 40 refugees and asylum seekers of all ages. The group walked some 50 kms from Pretoria, to an area near the Pumulani Plaza, en route to Limpopo before they were transported by a local charity the rest of the way to Musina. "We were surrounded on December 19 by different police units while we slept outside the UN offices," Masuka said this week. "The police took our documents and verified them with home affairs. They brought them back and agreed that we are not in this country illegally. "Moments later, still in the Pretoria central police station, the officers used a lot of force and beat most of us. Our women received the harshest beating. My son Paulsen asked a policeman why he was beating up his mother and he got slapped. They threatened to break his neck in the police station." Emmanuel Zigashane, from the DRC and Burundian Uwimana John, too narrate their experiences of assault inside the police station.
The police action followed court processes after private companies, Tiespro 230 and Smada Properties, which own and manages the UN building in Pretoria, approached the High Court in Pretoria seeking an order compelling the home affairs department to determine the basis "upon which the first respondents (immigrants) are in the country".
The property companies were also seeking an order directing home affairs to have the refugees and asylum seekers "relocated to either Lindela Repatriation Centre or the Tshwane interim refugee reception office within seven days".
In court papers, Smada Properties` Eileen Campodonico said the foreigners were camping at the Metro Park building because they believed that they could not be be arrested or deported while at the diplomatic centre, as "most, if not all, of their refugee
| | statuses were rejected" by home affairs.
But the immigrants insist their stay in South Africa is sanctioned and that is why home affairs and police were not allowed take them into cells or to Lindela. From their underwear, they produce refugee identity cards and asylum permits issued by home affairs to counter Campodonico`s assertions.
Campodonico stated that the migrants were consistently violent and had posed health hazards since they had no ablution services outside the UN premises. She recounted numerous incidents where she said the immigrants attacked security guards, forcefully entered the centre or protested outside, waving placards. "It is the (home affairs) department`s inaction and lack of initiative which allows for the untenable situation with the first respondents (migrants) to continue unabated. The majority of the (migrants) are illegal immigrants who, due to their statuses, cannot work or live in South Africa," Campodino told the court in her founding affidavit, seeking the refugees` eviction from the UN centre. On December 17, High Court Judge Lettie Molopa-Sethosa made an order, instructing the Tshwane Metro Police Department, the SA Police Service and the department of social development "to assist the second respondent (home affairs minister) in implementing and giving effect to its powers under section 41 (1) of the Immigration Act, 2002 in respect of all persons camping outside the Metro Park Building".
Masuka said what followed the court ruling was a joint operation by police units, characterised by brutality, inhuman treatment and assault.
"At night, the police came to take us into a truck. They said they were taking us to a shelter. For more than an hour, they drove around Gezina. The truck was closed and there wasn`t sufficient air inside. We had our children with us. They then told us that they can`t find a shelter for us," said Masuka.
"They later drove us to Saulsville Sports Arena. We got there around 2am on December 20. They left us in the open, with literally nothing. In the afternoon, UN officials we know as Marianna and Pamela brought us food."
The immigrants claim that when they were moved from Metro Park, they left all their belongings and the property was taken by the Tshwane Metro Police.
"Our blankets are gone. Some of us had new blankets. All the food we had was no longer there. The metro police told us to leave their premises, they say if we resist, they were calling for reinforcements to come and beat us. They told us to go back to our countries," said Masuka.
After subsequent confrontations and skirmishes around Pretoria central, the migrants set out, walking towards Zimbabwe. Two days later, non-governmental organisation Action Support Centre (ASC) got in touch with aid organisation, Gift of the Givers and transport was then provided for the long trip to Bishop Sithole`s shelter in Musina.
ASC community liaison officer Pretty Ncube said she would be visiting the group, to listen to their individual complaints. Her organisation was involved in creating cordial relations between South African citizens and immigrants in light of the xenophobic and frequent service delivery protests often witnessed in South Africa.
The place the migrants used to call home in Pretoria, outside the UN offices, has now been sealed with barbed wire and police tape. There is no going back there. ANA V.1531 |
One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.
- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr... - This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications. - Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.
Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139 Click here for full article | | One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.
-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process. -Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide. -LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.
Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.
In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.
V.6133 Click here for full article |
A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.
Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.
V.6130 Click here for full article | | On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.
Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.
V.6131 Click here for full article |
The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs. The United Statesâ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions. The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. V.6132 Click here for full article | | The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.
What does this mean for travelers? V.6127 Click here for full article |
1. Right to Legal Representationâ¢You have the right to consult with a legal representative.â¢Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.â¢Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Actâ¢You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you â¢If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.â¢BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121 Click here for full article | | Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122 Click here for full article |