Cape Town - A precedent-setting judgment focusing on South Africa`s
new immigration regulations could see foreigners with tourist visas
who are living here with South African partners being given spousal
visas without having to return to their home countries to apply for
the documents.


On Friday, a judgment handed down in the Western Cape High Court found
that Zimbabwean Lea Stewart, 40, whose husband and four sons live in
Cape Town, did not have to return to Zimbabwe to apply and wait for a
spousal visa from SA. Instead it was ordered that she be granted one
in South Africa.


Immigration lawyer Craig Smith said it effectively meant foreigners
married to or in a permanent relationship with a South African citizen
or permanent resident holder, could apply to change the conditions of
their visa to a spousal one without having to return to their home
country. They also do not have to wait in their home country for the
outcome of their applications.


The judgment said the Stewart family arrived from Zimbabwe on May 14,
2014 and set up home in Cape Town.


Stewart entered the country on a 90-day visitor`s visa. The new
immigration regulations came into effect about two weeks after they
arrived and they had not had any forewarning the laws would
change.


Before their arrival they had enquired in Harare about how to obtain
permanent residency for Stewart. "They were advised that she would
first require a `spousal visa` before she could apply for permanent
residency, and that both visas could be applied for once she

was in
the Republic," the judgment said. "Should this advice have proved to
be correct, the present application would be unnecessary."


Stewart and her husband believed she needed a certificate from police
to apply for temporary residency, so she returned to Zimbabwe in
August 2014 to get this document. When she returned to South Africa
she was given another 90-day visitor`s visa.


Stewart began applying for a spousal visa on her return, but her
application was denied and she applied to have this reviewed. This was
also denied.


"This decision was based on the fact that she did not qualify for a
temporary residence permit… because she was not permitted to change
the conditions of her current visitor`s visa in terms of (a section in
terms of an) Immigration Regulation," the judgment said.


Stewart tried to appeal this too. The judgment said the Immigration
Act made provision for a foreigner to apply to change the status of
their visa, but not the conditions of their visa. Stewart and her
family claimed that a section of the Immigration Act was inconsistent
with the constitution.


The judgment found that Stewart was entitled to be granted a spousal
visa.


The director-general of Home Affairs was also directed to issue
Stewart a visitor`s visa and allow her to apply for permanent
residence within three months. Home Affairs was ordered to pay the
family`s costs.
Weekend Argus V.1573

One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.

- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr...
- This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications.
- Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.

Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139
Click here for full article

One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.

-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process.
-Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide.
-LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.

Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.

In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.

 V.6133
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6128
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6129
Click here for full article

A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.

Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.

 V.6130
Click here for full article

On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.

Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.

 V.6131
Click here for full article

The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs.
The United States’ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions.
The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. V.6132
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6127
Click here for full article

1. Right to Legal Representation•You have the right to consult with a legal representative.•Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.•Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Act•You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you •If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.•BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122
Click here for full article