Revealed: immigration officers allowed to hack phones
10 April 2016 – The Guardian
Home Office granted powers to snoop on detention centre refugees three
years ago by amendment to 20-year-old Police Act
Immigration officials have been permitted to hack the phones of
refugees and asylum seekers, including rape and torture victims, for
the past three years.
The revelation has sparked outrage among civil rights groups and
campaigners for rape victims, who said that it was distressing that
the British government had rolled out powers that could target some of
the most vulnerable individuals in society.
The Home Office confirmed to the Observer that since 2013 immigration
officials have been granted the power to "property interference,
including interference with equipment", which can include planting a
listening device in a home, car or detention centre, as well as
hacking into phones or computers. Critics fear the powers could
undermine lawyer-client confidentiality in sensitive immigration and
asylum cases.
The power was authorised through an amendment to the Police Act 1997,
prompting campaigners to warn that intrusive technological powers are
being regulated by outdated legislation.
Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman,
said: "For far too long, vague and outdated legislation has been
exploited to extend the Home Office`s powers. No parliamentarian would
have ever foreseen immigration officers having the powers to hack into
our smartphones and computers of potentially quite vulnerable people."
Silkie Carlo, of the rights group Liberty, said: "The entirely new
power of routine communication interception at removal centres is a
blatantly discriminatory move."
Research has found that torture victims have been held in immigration
detention centres, and campaigners cite statistics suggesting that up
to 70% of women in centres like Yarl`s Wood in Bedfordshire are rape
survivors.
People have the right to speak privately and disclose sensitive
information about rape, torture and domestic violence
Cristal Amiss, Black Women`s Rape Action Project
Cristal Amiss, of the Black Women`s Rape Action Project, said: "These
powers are an outrage. People in detention have the right to
confidentiality, to speak privately to their lawyer and disclose often
very sensitive information such as details of rape, torture, domestic
violence and alleged abuse by officials. They have to be able to share
private information without their phones being hacked."
A Home Office briefing document detailing the hacking powers available
to immigration officers claims the aim "is to ensure

that immigration
officers can deploy a full range of investigative techniques to deal
effectively with all immigration crime".
A Home Office official confirmed that "equipment interference" had
been used to prevent serious crime, including disrupting the supply of
counterfeit travel documents, which could have been used to facilitate
the smuggling of illegal migrants. They did not address whether the
powers had been used to ascertain the veracity of asylum claims.
"They [immigration officers] may only use the power to investigate and
prevent serious crime which relates to an immigration or nationality
offence, and have done so since 2013," said a statement from the
immigration minister, James Brokenshire.
The revelation coincides with fresh concern over the latest version of
the "snooper`s charter", which will give the police powers to access
everyone`s web browsing histories and hack into phones. The extension
of police powers is contained in the investigatory powers bill,
designed to provide the world`s first comprehensive legal framework
for state surveillance powers. This also dates from the 1997 Police
Act, but the Home Office has tried to dampen disquiet by insisting
such powers would only be used in "exceptional circumstances",
extending the use of remote computer hacking from the security
services to the police – predominantly the National Crime Agency – in
cases involving a "threat to life", missing persons or cases that risk
"damage to somebody`s mental health".
The bill has met severe criticism from three parliamentary committees,
and surveillance campaigners are challenging MPs to improve safety and
confidentiality measures before it is rushed into law. Carmichael
said: "Parliament must be given the time it needs to properly
scrutinise and improve it."
Carlo said: "The bill contains the flimsiest of safeguards and takes
state hacking to an unprecedented and dangerous new level. It allows
for practically limitless bulk hacking against the devices of
individuals, groups or even entire nations."
Liberty warns that powers to hack millions of devices en masse remain
in the bill, despite recommendations from parliament`s intelligence
and security committee that they be removed. Elsewhere, the security
services will still be able to examine the browsing histories of the
entire population, and the communications of MPs, journalists and
lawyers open to access by intelligence agencies. V.1612

One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.

- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr...
- This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications.
- Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.

Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139
Click here for full article

One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.

-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process.
-Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide.
-LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.

Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.

In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.

 V.6133
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6128
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6129
Click here for full article

A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.

Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.

 V.6130
Click here for full article

On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.

Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.

 V.6131
Click here for full article

The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs.
The United States’ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions.
The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. V.6132
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6127
Click here for full article

1. Right to Legal Representation•You have the right to consult with a legal representative.•Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.•Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Act•You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you •If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.•BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122
Click here for full article