Home Affairs : Rejection and Appeals: What to do when your
application has been rejected.
As with any change there comes with it a lot of miscommunication and
an increase in the number of failed applications. It appears that
there has been a sharp increase in the number of visa and permit
application being rejected and many prospective immigrants are left
to wonder how on earth they can navigate this now even more complex
immigration system.
The primary basis of appeals and review in the context of immigration
is contained in the Act itself. Section 8 of the immigration act
provides the basis on which applicants can appeal to either the
Director General or the Minister to review any adverse decision made
by the Department. Section 8(1) and 8(2) and deals primarily with
decisions to refuse entry to a foreigner at a port of entry. These
sections are often very contentious
Legal Basis of appeals and reviews
The above section provides that any adverse decision by the
Department must be communicated in writing with reasons.
For this reasons applicant whose applications have been rejected have
a right to be informed and be given written reasons. This section is
given expression in the form of a Rejection letter issued by the
Department.
Upon receiving the rejection letter the applicant has 10 working days
(2 weeks) to appeal the decision. When can a Decision be appealed? An
appeal is not a second chance to submit documents not submitted in
the first application. It is not enough to simply supplement the
documents submitted but there must be a ground to review the decision
of the adjudicator based on the documents already present. In
appealing the decision the applicant is saying to the Director
General or Minister that “based on the documents I submitted in my
original application this decision is wrong and must be reversed”
A decision that is biased, arbitrary, and capricious in nature can be
appealed.
Bias: A decision is considered biased when it is influenced by a
predisposition of the adjudicator. In this case the adjudicated forms
an opinion based on factors outside the facts presented before
him/her in the application. A common occurrence is found in the
adjudication of work visa and spouse visa application where reference
to high unemployment levels and prevalence of marriages of
convenience are made.
Arbitrary: A

decision is considered arbitrary when it has no legal
basis and random. For instance where an application for a Spouse Visa
with a work endorsement is rejected on the basis that the applicant
did not provide a Labour Certificate. In this instant the Labour
certificate is not a requirement for a Spouse Visa- Work Endorsement
and therefore the decision is arbitrary because it has no legal
basis. Many rejections are arbitrary and can be successfully appealed.
Capricious: quite similar to an arbitrary decision and often an
arbitrary decision is also capricious but no always. A decision is
capricious when it does not follow the law or logic and often
whimsical in nature. For example, applicant A applies for a visa
without providing proper authentication, a trend has developed and
not application is ever denied on that basis. Applicant B applies
without proper authentication and is rejected on that basis, while
the decision may be correct it may be considered capricious due the
sudden unexplained change.
How to appeal an adverse decision successfully?
Once it has been established that an adverse decision can be appealed
an applicant can then prepare an appeal to that effect. It is
important to put your case with as much detail as possible and attach
all relevant documentation.
Appeals can be quite technical and where possible it is wise to seek
the aid of a professional to assist you.
Final remarks.
If you are certain that the decision is wrong then a well thought out
and prepared appeal will have an adverse decision reversed. It is
unclear how long should the Director General or Minister take to
consider an appeal but generally and in our opinion it should not
take more than the time it take to consider an application. Reviewing
a decision already made does not require the consideration of the
entire application afresh but the points that are being challenged in
the appeal. Legislation and the courts are yet to make pronouncements
on how long is a reasonable period to wait for an appeal before the
delay is considered unreasonable. Where such a delay occurs
applicants will have recourse to the High Court as excessive delays
are reviewable by the court
www.samigration.com V.2218

One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.

- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr...
- This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications.
- Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.

Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139
Click here for full article

One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.

-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process.
-Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide.
-LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.

Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.

In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.

 V.6133
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6128
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6129
Click here for full article

A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.

Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.

 V.6130
Click here for full article

On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.

Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.

 V.6131
Click here for full article

The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs.
The United States’ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions.
The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. V.6132
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6127
Click here for full article

1. Right to Legal Representation•You have the right to consult with a legal representative.•Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.•Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Act•You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you •If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.•BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122
Click here for full article