BREAKING NEWS!!!

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES ON THE SITUATION REGARDING ASYLUM SEEKER
TEMPORARY VISA HOLDERS AND REFUGEES IN TERMS OF CHANGE OF STATUS

On Tuesday 9th October 2018 the Apex Court of South Africa - the
highest Court in the land - the Constitutional Court ruled on the
situation surrounding the ability of Asylum Seeker Temporary Visa
holders and Refugee Permit holders being enabled to change their
status to mainstream visas in the Temporary or Permanent Residence
categories under The Immigration Act.
Some years back the Department of Home Affairs, through the Director
General, issued a Departmental Directive referred to as the “Debone
Directive” in terms of which it became possible for an Asylum Seeker
holding an Asylum Seeker Temporary Visa, as well as an Asylum Seeker
who had been confirmed as a Refugee, to apply for an appropriate visa
under The Immigration Act.
This did mean that the applicant had to qualify in the specific
category of Temporary or Permanent Residence they were applying in, in
order to achieve this, and all of this without them having to
relinquish their Asylum Seeker or Refugee Status in that process.
A subsequent ruling by the Director General of Home Affairs saw the
Debone Directive being withdrawn, thereby closing the door on this
process. A series of Court Applications in the High Court in the
Western Cape culminating in an Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeals,
then followed. During that process there was a see-saw of change.
Firstly, in an Appeal against the original successful Court
Application in the Western Cape High Court, the Appeal was upheld,
thereby maintaining the status quo.
The Director General and Minister of Home Affairs then Appealed that
ruling to the Supreme Court of Appeals, who then confirmed the court a
quo, i.e. the Western Cape High Court’s decision, to uphold the Debone
Directive.

There is only one more level of Appeal in South African Law and that
is to approach the Constitutional Court on matters that relate to or
have Constitutional implications and to Appeal to that Apex Court.
The current Judgement is therefore the end of the road on this topic.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR YOU IF YOU ARE THE HOLDER OF A CURRENT ASYLUM
SEEKER TEMPORARY VISA OR REFUGEE PERMIT AND WISH TO AVAIL YOURSELF OF
THIS “NEW” DISPENSATION?

What this does mean for you, is that if you indeed qualify in a
specific category of Temporary or Permanent Residence that you wish to
apply in, that you can in fact now do so. There may be a small time
lag between the implementation of the Court Order and the current
time, but the Constitutional Court has spoken on topic and this opens
the door.

Therefore, if you hold an Asylum Seeker Temporary Visa that is current
or a Refugee Permit that is current i.e. has been renewed timeously on
an on-going basis, then we would suggest that you contact our office
urgently so that we can evaluate the viability of you being able to
change status at this stage without prejudicing your current status.
Please respond to :
How can we help you , please email us to info@sami.co.za or whatsapp
me on +2782 373 8415, where are you now? check our website :
www.samigration.com

Alternatively , please contact us on :
Sa Migration International
Tel No office : +27 (0) 82 373 8415 â€` Whatsapp no as well
Tel No admin : +27 (0) 64 126 3073
Tel No sales : +27 (0) 74 0366127
Fax No : 086 579 0155

Should you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact
our office.
AS ALWAYS, WE ENDEAVOR TO KEEP YOU UP TO DATE ON ALL IMMIGRATION
RELATED ISSUES
SA Migration Team V.2534

One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.

- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr...
- This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications.
- Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.

Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139
Click here for full article

One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.

-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process.
-Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide.
-LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.

Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.

In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.

 V.6133
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6128
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6129
Click here for full article

A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.

Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.

 V.6130
Click here for full article

On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.

Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.

 V.6131
Click here for full article

The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs.
The United States’ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions.
The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. V.6132
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6127
Click here for full article

1. Right to Legal Representation•You have the right to consult with a legal representative.•Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.•Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Act•You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you •If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.•BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122
Click here for full article