The United States could forfeit an estimated 9.4 billion dollars in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new 250 dollars `visa integrity fee,` according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs.
The United States’ decision to introduce a 250 dollars `visa integrity fee` on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions.
The 250dollar `visa integrity fee,` part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries.

The fee is non-waivable, non-reducible, and charged on top of existing MRV, anti-fraud, and reciprocity fees.

The policy has drawn particular concern across Africa, where high travel costs, tariff barriers, and strict visa regimes already limit access to the American market. For many middle-class travellers from Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and Ghana, an additional 250 dollars charge could turn U.S. tourism into a privilege reserved for the ultra-wealthy.

Economic Fallout
According to the U.S. Travel Association, the fee is expected to reduce visitor spending by 9.4 billion dollars and tax revenue by 1.3 billion dollars over the next three years. The group also estimates that about 15,000 U.S. travel jobs could be lost as a result of fewer international arrivals.
Forbes reports that these projections stand in sharp contrast to calculations by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which expects the fee to generate 27 billion dollars over ten years, roughly 2.7 billion dollars annually, for the U.S. Treasury.
However, industry economists argue the CBO analysis focused only on revenue collection, excluding the wider economic fallout of reduced travel demand.

`By longstanding tradition, the Congressional Budget Office does not incorporate macroeconomic feedback effects into its traditional cost estimates,` a CBO spokesperson told Forbes. `We didn’t specifically do a dynamic analysis of this provision.`
Similarly, Tourism Economics, a division of Oxford Economics, estimates the 250 dollars fee could discourage 5.4% of international visitors, almost one million trips annually. Fewer visitors mean reduced spending on hotels, restaurants, retail, and cultural attractions, which in turn lowers tax income and weakens job creation.

Impact on Africa
Erik Hansen, senior vice president of government relations at the U.S. Travel Association, said: `Congress made the mistake of assuming that this worldwide visa integrity fee would not have a big impact on visitors from countries like India or Brazil. This is the exact type of armchair public policymaking that is going to get us into a big mess.`

While Hansen highlighted India as a `bright spot` for inbound travel, with Indian

tourists spending 13.3 billion dollars in the U.S. in 2024, similar growth has been recorded across Africa.

Demand from students, entrepreneurs, and leisure travellers has been rising since the pandemic, with airlines such as Ethiopian Airlines, South African Airways, and Royal Air Maroc expanding U.S. bound capacity. However, a new supercharge from Washington could halt this trajectory.
For African students in particular, the cost comes on top of visa application charges, SEVIS fees, and proof-of-funds requirements.

Analysts warn that the fee risks slowing down people-to-people exchanges, business travel, and academic opportunities that have traditionally linked the U.S. and Africa. And could redirect African families to more accessible destinations such as Canada, the UK, and China.

Refund Controversy
Congress has described the fee as refundable once a visa expires, provided all conditions are met. But with most U.S. visitor visas valid for ten years, the refund process appears impractical.
`The idea that you’re going to give the government money and then wait around 10 years and remember to ask for it back, even if you followed the rules, is just absolutely crazy,` Hansen told Forbes.
The CBO itself acknowledged that only `a small number of people would seek reimbursement` and noted that the State Department would require years to create a refund system.

Tourism Competitiveness at Risk
The timing of the new fee raises further questions about U.S. tourism competitiveness and openness, especially as the country prepares to host global sporting events like the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup.
A World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) report in June forecast that international visitor spending in the U.S. could fall by as much as 29 billion dollars in 2025, the only major economy projected to see a decline.
`While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is putting up the ‘closed’ sign,` Julia Simpson, president and CEO of WTTC, said.

Outlook
Unlike travellers from over 40 countries, including Japan, South Korea, most of Western Europe, and Australia, who enjoy visa-free entry to the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program, no African country is included. This means African travellers, already burdened with strict visa requirements, will be disproportionately affected by the additional 250 dollars fee.
Fewer Africans travelling to the U.S. could mean reduced cultural, academic, and professional exchanges, weakening U.S.â€`Africa ties at a time when China, Europe, and the Gulf states are aggressively courting African travellers.
The fee could also discourage family visits, cutting remittance-linked travel flows, and make it harder for African SMEs and startups to access U.S. markets. As Hansen warned: `It will absolutely deter travelâ€`that’s what our research has found.`
 V.6132

One of the highlighted topics: Critical Skills Visa.

- Key Insight: Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast track to working in South Afr...
- This matter relates to critical skills visa and its broader implications.
- Individuals are advised to seek professional guidance.

Is your profession on the Critical Skills List? This visa is your fast trac V.6139
Click here for full article

One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, became a victim of identity theft in 2012 when fraudulent transactions occurred, using her personal details.

-The Pretoria High Court found that the department of home affairs had violated constitutional rights without due process.
-Only half of Lawyers for Human Rights` test group has been unblocked, while 385 000 identities remain blocked nationwide.
-LHR appeals extension, urges affected people to seek help now.

Lawyers for Human Rights (LHR) are intensifying pressure on the department of home affairs over the national ID-blocking crisis, accusing the state of acting too slowly to unblock qualifying individuals despite a landmark court ruling.

In January last year, the Pretoria High Court found that the department`s practice of blocking IDs without due process was unlawful and unconstitutional. One of the applicants, Phindile Mazibuko, a Swati citizen and South African permanent resident since 1998, fell victim to identity theft in 2012 when fraudsters used her personal details.

 V.6133
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6128
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6129
Click here for full article

A Washington state mother and her 6-year-old son have been released after spending more than three weeks in US immigration detention due to a brief trip to Canada and a small paperwork mistake, her attorney told CNN on Saturday.

Sarah Shaw, a New Zealand citizen who has lived legally in the US since she arrived in 2021, was detained at the Blaine, Washington, Customs and Border Protection checkpoint when returning home after dropping her two oldest children off at the Vancouver airport for a flight to visit their grandparents in New Zealand. Shaw, 33, chose the flight out of Vancouver because it was direct and she didn`t want her children to have to navigate a layover alone, her attorney Minda Thorward, told CNN.

 V.6130
Click here for full article

On 22 July 2025, the Gauteng High Court dismissed Sitrusrand Boerdery`s review of the Department of Employment and Labour`s refusal to issue a Working Conditions and Salary Benchmarking Certificate, an essential precondition for obtaining corporate visas under the Immigration Act.

Acting Judge Kekana AJ held that the Department`s decision was lawful, rational and procedurally fair. This judgment illustrates how businesses can - and must - structure their corporate visa applications to meet statutory requirements, and how legal practitioners should prepare robust review challenges when administrative authorities decline to recommend foreign-work permits.

 V.6131
Click here for full article

The Border Management Authority (BMA) has doubled its staff at Airports in South Africa , including immigration officers.

What does this mean for travelers? V.6127
Click here for full article

1. Right to Legal Representation•You have the right to consult with a legal representative.•Contact an immigration practitioner, legal aid clinic, or attorney urgently.•Do not sign any documents without understanding them fully. 2. Section 34 of the Immigration Act•You must be brought to court with 48 hours to confirm arrest but you can remain locked up very long as courts figure out what to do with you •If you`re found to be illegally in South Africa, you may be detained for up to 30 days (extendable by a magistrate) pending deportation.•BUT this cannot happen arbitrarily. You must be informed of your rights, and Home Affairs must follow due process.- becomes a nightmare , you could lose your job , business , place to stay V.6121
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6122
Click here for full article

Driving for Bolt, Uber, Mr D, or Checkers Sixty60?If you`re undocumented, you`re risking more than just your income.The Risks if You`re Not Legal: - Vehicle impoundment - Heavy fines - Arrest & deportation - Permanent bans from working in SA V.6123
Click here for full article