Victorian government pushes back on in-classroom surveillance

Source: ZD Net, 07/02/2019

The Australian government in August last year kicked off a trial
that saw surveillance cameras placed in classrooms to monitor if
students were in attendance.
The now-completed trial took place in a few private schools in the
state, and the funding was accounted for at a federal level.
According to the Digital Rights Watch -- a charity aimed at
educating on and upholding the digital rights of Australians --
the next phase of the trial was to roll out the program to state-
run schools.
The initiative would involve the placement of cameras within
classrooms that scan the faces of students and then compare the
images against photos kept on file. Any instances of missing
students would then be reported.
However, Victorian Education Minister James Merlino has moved to
block the initiative from being rolled out, calling it `Big
Brother-like`.
With concerns over the privacy of students and the level of
consent kids are capable of providing, Victoria`s Information
Commissioner Sven Bleummel told ABC RN Drive that he personally
wouldn`t let his child participate.
He explained the tech that would be in classrooms would not just
be for initial roll call in the morning, rather they would be
constantly scanning the students throughout the day.
`We have to make some fundamental choices about the society we
live in and the idea that our children should consider it normal
to be in a fairly constant state of surveillance, I think is a
rather unhealthy one,` he told ABC.
Additionally, the Victorian government wants schools to undertake
a rigorous privacy assessment of the surveillance technology and
receive explicit, informed consent from parents and carers.
`The second category of risk is the much more understandable and
tangible risk of information being secure,` Bleummel said,
pointing to the security concerns brought up by the Australian
government`s My Health Record initiative.
He said he was concerned that although the system itself may be
strongly encrypted, the biometric information is still captured.
`Unlike a password, you can`t reset your facial geometry,` he
added.
On the topic of consent, Bleummel said parental sign off isn`t a
sufficient safeguard, particularly when parents might feel obliged
to say yes only to avoid having their child ostracised, posing the
question that it might not be a fully voluntary consent given.
Another issue with consent, according to the Information
Commissioner, is the length and complexity of the terms and
conditions in documents that provide such services, pointing to
social media sites as one example, saying people often do not
actually know what it is they`re consenting to.
`Fundamentally, we believe that students have a right to not be
recorded without their -- or their guardian`s -- consent,` Digital
Rights Watch Chair Tim Singleton Norton told ZDNet.
`It`s imperative that every parent or guardian understand just
what is at stake here. Constant monitoring of their child`s face,
along with the very real possibility of a mass data breach, should
be of concern. This is not the world we want to build for our
children.`
The Department of Home Affairs is currently responsible for the
operation of a central hub of a facial recognition system that
will link up identity-matching systems between government agencies
in Australia.
The Australia-wide initiative will allow state and territory law
enforcement agencies to have access to the country`s new face
matching services to access passport, visa, citizenship, and
driver licence images from other jurisdictions.
The Face Verification Service (FVS) is a one-to-one image-based
verification service that will match a person`s photo against an
image on one of their government records, while the Face
Identification Service (FIS) is a one-to-many, image-based
identification service that can match a photo of an unknown person
against multiple government records to help establish their
identity.
Access to the FIS is limited to police and security agencies, or
specialist fraud prevention areas within agencies that issue
passports, as well as immigration and citizenship documents.
The Department of Home Affairs told a Parliamentary Joint
Committee on Intelligence and Security in May it had purchased a
facial recognition algorithm from a vendor to be used for the FIS,
but claimed immunity on disclosing the contracted vendor.